![]()
![]()
Production Manager/ On Capturing
A 1992 interview for |
![]() |
|
Doherty: It actually was the first time I had worked
with them [Scorsese and De Fina] although I'm very good friends with a fellow
named Joe Reidy, who is the first assistant director [We've worked on a number
of movies including JFK]. I wouldn't say that Joe was exactly responsible
for getting me the job I had also worked with Bruce Pustin [the unit
production manager] before on another movie where he was production manager,
and it was actually Bruce who brought me to the project. But I think that
Joe's vote of confidence was something that made Marty and Barbara feel better,
and the credits I suppose that I've had. So I was hired basically as
the assistant production manager/location manager.
I was called about the job originally a year ago September when it
was at 20th Century Fox and then it went into turnaround and I didn't think
that the movie was even happening. And sometime in November Bruce gave me
a call that it looked like it might be going at Columbia. I was in
Chicago, this was just before Christmas, so I flew back to New York and in
a heartbeat we set up, we resurrected a lot of the research that had been
done, and Robin Standefer had done a great deal of research as [had] the
New York State film office, and a location person named Amy Herman who did
a lot of the initial scouting on the job, and those files and that research
was pretty much where I picked up with one kind of big problem which was
the Opera House. They were looking into an opera house up in Troy, because
they had decided that Troy was really the best place for their exteriors,
they had already made that determination by then but the way the schedule
the budget and everything laid out, they'd have to find a music hall up there
and the best one was the Troy Music Hall but it really didn't fit the bill
of what Edith Wharton had been writing about.
I should back up and say [production designer] Dante Ferretti did
a projection of what it would take to make the Music Hall look like they
needed it to look like and it just cost a fortune, so we then initiated a
search nationwide just to find if, compared to what it was going to cost
to make the other one usable, we could afford to send a crew somewhere else.
So I was working with people in Washington DC, at the American Theatre
Historical Society and all around the country, I mean we called up places
in Baraboo, Wisconsin, you can't imagine. We researched over 900 theatres
in December. We narrowed it down to a field of about 2 or 3, [though]
we actually knew from the very beginning the Philadelphia Academy of Music
was really the only choice because it looked a great deal like the New York
Academy of Music did before it was torn down. They had not had a film there
before, however, and I think that when they first inquired about it, it wasn't
available and they were turned down. Dante was really adamant about
reinitiating contact with them. Dante and I jumped on an Amtrak train
one day and went over there and we talked to a fellow named Hugh Walsh who
is very nice, but their schedule was solidly booked for the time we were
to be in production from March through June.
So with that we tried to extract a day or two here and there to see
if there was any window of opportunity at all and I have to say that Hugh
Walsh was a really, really great ally because what he did was, bit by bit,
he relocated events and performances during that period and he dug out the
betterpart of a week for us [at] Memorial Day, which allowed us to film,
and in my opinion it was one of the most extraordinary locations in the film.
And said more in just what it is and what it looked like than what we could
ever have done. You couldn't recreate this place, I mean it was just that
spectacular. It was real, real important and I think that was the first real
triumph because it really started making everything else fit together, so
the schedule came together with the Troy locations and we were still scouting
right down to the wire, even up in Troy and certainly in New York, everything
started to gel.
What was the time line for your work with locations?
The first scout with Marty was in December. Then we went on a hiatus
for Christmas. [Afterwards], we really got into it and it was more evident
that we were going to be green-lighted, because we weren't a green light
in December, and at the point when we were green lighted that's when Dante
and I really got down to business finding the locations.
I was kind of wearing two hats for the first two or three months of
the film, and then along about February I started a location manager in New
York to manage the locations that we had already found. We were still
looking for one or two.
Who was that?
A fellow named Joe Iberty, who did a wonderful, wonderful job on the
movie, very experienced, really a great guy. And he stayed in New York
and I pretty much set Troy up, got all those permissions together with a
fellow named Mark von Holstein who was my assistant up there. Dante
was basically commuting between Troy and New York. I had to do
Philadelphia and after Memorial Day finished up in the spring time in some
of the exterior locations like the old Westbury Gardens, the places where
we needed to see them outside.
So that's pretty much basically how I came to the project and what
happened. But it was my first time working with Marty which was needless
to say a very memorable experience. We got along well, so that was a plus
point.
Do you come to your New York location work as a native
NewYorker?
No. I was born on Long Island and moved away when I was quite
young, when I was about 9 years old, and lived in a number of different places
I lived in Tuscan for a long time, Chicago and Colorado. So
it was a real shock to come back 10 years ago, but I've been living in Manhattan
ever since, and pretty much when I came and started in film in New York,
I somehow or other just gravitated towards locations. I can't even really
say how or why; it's not like I decided that's what I came here to
do, it's just what I ended up doing. But I'm sort of a believer in
that you gravitate toward what you're good at or what you like. I was
an architecture student at one point and abandoned that so I think that my
interest in film together with kind of an old interest in architecture
subconsciously was a natural direction for me to take, to head towards doing
locations, because it really is kind of a marriage of both those
elements.
Was this your first period piece set in New York?
I worked on a movie called HOUSE ON SULLIVAN STREET which was a 1951-era
movie with Kelly McGillis and Jeff Daniels. Michael Ballhaus as a matter
of fact was the DP on that. That was actually enormous in a lot of
ways from a location standpoint, in terms of what we were recreating. I
worked in Chicago on this TV series, CRIME STORY, which was [set in] the
1950s. I had never worked on something which was this far back in time,
so that was particularly interesting to me, because it's one thing to do
the '50s or the '30s, but when you go all the way back to 1880 that's a whole
other deal altogether it's so far removed from what's familiar to
us.
Does that free you up, because it's so unfamiliar to an
audience?
Except in the 1880s if something is wrong it's really wrong!
It stands out like a sore thumb.
I mean, if a building were constructed in 1892 but you happened
to really like it, you could still use it in an 1880s movie, right? Most people wouldn't be
able to tell if it were an anachronism.
That's very true, although with Dante that's not so easy. I
mean, he's really a stickler not only about the year something was constructed
but the architectural style. And when it came down to each character
Ellen's house vs. Mrs. Mingott's it really boiled down to wanting
the architecture to represent the characters, which is in fact true,
especially in high society New York in the 19th Century. The
types of houses they constructed really were a reflection of the circles
that they were running in and the kind of money they had, and (more importantly)
the kind of background they came from.
And how long they'd had their money.
Exactly, and how they got it and how flamboyant they are, like the
Van Der Luydun house was really a location that we labored over because,
although the Van Der Luyduns are extremely influential and extremely
well-respected, they're not flamboyant people. And the Old Merchant's
House idea of having something be more spare in its architectural detail
and elements, it's a kind of a contradiction to somebody who's not as familiar
with how different people's backgrounds relate to the type of architecture
they live in they are influential in the money, they didn't have a
great big house, because everybody reveres them so, but in fact that is not
true.
We were going to film in the Old Merchant's House down on 4th Street,
almost in the East Village. It's now a museum and it's a really beautiful
little house, and we really loved it, and Michael Ballhaus really loved it
as well, but we wanted to do a camera move a lot of the details, the
way Marty zeroed in on design and on character and on defining who these
people were and the way they lived was by zeroing in on elements, and dressing
up, customs, all the little details of their house and what they would do
so consequently Michael Ballhaus was really given a challenge. He
was in these locations and examining in very intimate and intricate ways
in these people's lives, slightly voyeuristically just going through their
houses and watching them eat and watching them serve and watching them do
this and that, in a very penetrating kind of way. He really needed
to have the freedom to make moves with his camera not in disturbing ways
but just so he could penetrate a little bit deeper than just having a PBS
piece, because what Marty's camera was doing was a little bit more than just
being an objective eye. So at any rate this room and rooms didn't really
lend themselves to that particular shot that they had in mind.
Marty is really wonderful to work with because he's so specific; he
had made the movie in his mind already by the time you show up on
location.
You're trying to marry all those constraints and all those elements:
that it be the right period; that it be the right feel; that it be
available; that they let you do what it is you need to do, because these
are historic places, museums, and they're very, very delicate
or they're people's houses that have been restored for zillions of dollars
within an inch of their lives. And if you need to make changes, and
Dante made changes everywhere, he wallpapered, he draperied, he set dressed,
he just went to town to really create very specifically the characters and
the places that Marty and he wanted to create. So when you have all
those constraints working against you to find just the right place where
you can do just what you need to do that's available when you need it to
be available . . . it'sdifficult!
We ended up going to the Americas Society on Park Avenue, because
it has that same feel and that same spareness but they were slightly grander
rooms in terms of size and gave us the ability to do those kinds of movements,
but their house I guess the point I'm trying to make is their house as compared
to the Mingott house, it's like such the other end of the spectrum
I mean, Mrs. Mingott's ridiculous, everything about her, her
home and her life is so over the top. If you don't have a Victorian or a
19th Century eye you certainly know when something is flamboyant or not but
you really, scouting these things you really start to appreciate
A lot of things obviously in the Victorian Era were very ornate anyway,
so to have a discerning eye over what's ornate and what's really like Mrs.
Mingott is, you get used to it after a while, and your eye becomes trained
as to what's more and what's less.
|
copyright © 1992, 1997 David Morgan
WIDE ANGLE / CLOSEUP
is written by David Morgan; this site was designed using his gray matter.
For photo credits to pictures on these pages
click here.
For comments contact morgands1@aol.com.
The editorial materials here are copyrighted and may not be copied, reproduced
or retransmitted
without the expressly written consent of the author.